SQL Server to PostgreSQL Migration Cost Defense Checklist
A pragmatic checklist to defend the business case for migrating away from Microsoft SQL Server.
Series / Fundamentals
Review prompts and decision frameworks for architecture, database, security, cloud, automation, and AI access decisions before they become production risk.
Tech leads and architects running design reviews or evaluating their own systems for production readiness. Each post is a reusable checklist, not a conceptual overview.
You've shipped systems to production and have opinions about what went wrong. These checklists assume you can evaluate the answers, not just ask the questions.
A pragmatic checklist to defend the business case for migrating away from Microsoft SQL Server.
A pragmatic checklist to defend the business case for migrating away from Microsoft SQL Server.
Assessing lock type, table size, reversibility, and rollback plan before every schema migration — a structured checklist for zero-downtime deployments.
A SQL-driven audit workflow for identifying unused, duplicate, bloated, and missing indexes in PostgreSQL before they drain write performance and storage.
A systematic runbook for assessing MongoDB version upgrade risk — FCV, driver compatibility, deprecated operators, and rollback paths before any production cutover.
Granting an autonomous AI agent access to your database breaks every assumption of traditional RBAC. How to secure databases against unpredictable, unbounded AI queries.
Review checklist for database-backed cloud applications: connection saturation, migration locking, retry amplification, and region dependency failures.
A pre-go-live architecture review for MongoDB Queryable Encryption — key management, field classification, query type constraints, driver requirements, and key rotation.
A practical review pattern where one agent creates a change and specialized agents review risk, rollback, security, and observability.
A five-question checklist before running automation in production: are inputs bounded, is state understood, are permissions scoped, is rollback credible, and is the audit trail durable enough to reconstruct what happened.
The hardest automation incidents are not broken tools — they happen when every tool executes exactly as asked while the surrounding system loses the ability to evaluate whether that action is still safe.
Terraform plan review is not a syntax check — it is the last cheap place to catch a production architecture mistake before an API turns intent into infrastructure. What senior engineers actually look for in a plan output.
Database Terraform modules fail when they hide operational decisions behind convenient defaults — a checklist covering parameter groups, backup policies, encryption, and the boundaries that must never be automated away.
Most system designs fail for reasons visible at review time: overloaded dependencies, ambiguous ownership, unsafe retries, unbounded queues, and missing rollback paths — a checklist senior engineers use to surface those risks early.
Terraform review fails when humans rediscover the same constraints in every PR — how OPA, Sentinel, and Checkov encode policy gates that catch public storage buckets, unencrypted databases, and missing tags at plan time.
Azure database recovery beyond 'we have backups': failover group cutover, geo-replication lag, and backup restore testing as the real reliability floor.
Cloud SQL, Spanner, Bigtable, Memorystore, and BigQuery each bill differently — cost overruns trace to applying the wrong model to the wrong workload.
OCI disaster recovery gaps that emerge when teams rely on regional failover alone, and how Data Guard and GoldenGate address the database replication tier.
Hot key contention, connection pool exhaustion, and cache miss bursts each hit local thresholds before aggregate dashboards show anything alarming.
Stripe's Minions system runs over a thousand AI code reviews weekly using a fork of an open-source agent. The reliability comes from the deterministic pipeline around it, not the model inside.
Engineers often over-rotate to Hardware Security Modules (HSMs) for non-regulatory workloads or under-rotate to database extensions. How to map data classification to the right cryptographic tier.
Terraform in CI/CD requires different gates than application deployments: plan review thresholds, apply lock design, environment promotion, and a rollback boundary that actually works when state diverges.
The four failure boundaries in event-driven systems: schema evolution contracts, ordering guarantees, consumer replay safety, and dead-letter queue handling.
Splitting a service without relocating the database boundary creates distributed coordination overhead worse than the monolith the split was meant to fix.
How to choose between AWS, Azure, GCP, and OCI for database-backed systems by matching managed database failure behavior to your system's dominant recovery requirement.
Review questions a staff engineer asks to surface cascade failures, missing fallbacks, state boundaries, and load assumptions that design docs bury.
Nine breakout repositories across three themes — agents that operated computers, RAG that grew a graph spine, and databases that finally spoke natively to LLMs — define what actually shifted in the engineering stack in 2024.
When AI agents accelerate platform operations versus when they generate unreviewed changes — the permission boundary and audit design that separates useful from risky.
A field note on why agent evaluation should measure verified state changes instead of polished reasoning traces.
Database repositories contain hidden rules human reviewers know: never add a blocking index at peak hours, never widen IAM without owner approval. Agent review surfaces these violations before merge — without displacing the human judgment that set the rules.
Nine breakout repos across four themes — MCP protocol adoption, agent memory infrastructure, AI-native platform ops, and database automation — that eliminated the hand-built glue code between AI agents and production systems.
A practitioner walkthrough of the review method: what to look at, in what order, how to quantify an opportunity honestly, and how to turn findings into a prioritized 30/60/90-day plan.